<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Basic on Cesar Gimenes</title><link>https://crg.eti.br/en/tags/basic/</link><description>Recent content in Basic on Cesar Gimenes</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>crg@crg.eti.br (Cesar Gimenes)</managingEditor><webMaster>crg@crg.eti.br (Cesar Gimenes)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:12:16 -0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://crg.eti.br/en/tags/basic/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>BASIC Is Still Alive and Kicking</title><link>https://crg.eti.br/en/post/basic-ainda-esta-vivo/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:12:16 -0300</pubDate><author>crg@crg.eti.br (Cesar Gimenes)</author><guid>https://crg.eti.br/en/post/basic-ainda-esta-vivo/</guid><description>&lt;p>While researching BASIC implementations, I found some interesting things. It&amp;rsquo;s amazing that a language this old, and with this many problems, still exists. You can even find commercial compilers still under active development for it.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Yes, even though I&amp;rsquo;m a fan and love playing with BASIC for the nostalgia and the fun, there&amp;rsquo;s no denying that BASIC causes more problems than it solves. (In my opinion)&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Of course, an extremely simple language made sense when BASIC was born, in 1964. Machines had few resources, and the goal was a language for beginners. BASIC stands for &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BASIC">Beginner&amp;rsquo;s All-Purpose Symbolic Instruction Code&lt;/a>&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>